Her Voice: City should keep hands off West Side Market
by Nancy Matthews / For the Tracy Press
Jun 03, 2011 | 4206 views | 18 18 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
In regard to the city of Tracy’s alleged interest in ridding itself of the historic grocery property on the southwest corner of Central Avenue and Eighth Street, there are topics which should be discussed, and I am going to mention them.

One: Since I drop into that grocery store en route home from work, which can be all hours of the day and/or evening, I wonder if I am included as an “unsavory character” seen to frequent the area (“Second Thoughts: Tracy looks toward downtown addition”). “Unsavory character” at 80-plus-years-old holds a certain fascination for me, I have to admit.

Two: The persons I see frequenting this corner grocery, which is well-kept with friendly and efficient employees, are primarily people from the neighborhood. I stand in line behind mothers with babies bouncing on their hips, older sisters with a gaggle of younger family members carefully allotting each his or her share of the candy money for the trip to get treats, men juggling hurriedly-looked-for items to bring home, old ladies like myself walking in to pick up their daily rations (weekly rations seems optimistic at our age).

Three: The city of Tracy has hired a plethora of experts to solve the ills of downtown Tracy with changing administrations since I arrived in 1953 to work as a reporter on the Tracy Press. The latest experts prescribed downtown renewal based on encouraging retail businesses only along the streetscape. OK, here we are following the prescription, we have an active retail grocery on a corner in an historic old neighborhood. West Side Market has been a retail grocery since Gus Margaros and Jim Vlahos held forth in that area, serving their neighborhood with the original West Side Market way back when. Sure, its products being sold have changed to reflect neighborhood needs, but it is busy.

It is prescribed “retail.”

Four: The city oversaw renewal of the southern half of that block by eminent domain, taking property off tax rolls to renew the Grand Theatre and adjacent buildings, admittedly a very attractive complex that periodically generates traffic. The project doesn’t exactly match the active retail requirement listed by the latest “study.” Not following the study prescription is not a surprise. The precedent for ignoring all or parts of prior studies happens. Those studies now gather dust somewhere in the bowels of some city storage facility. Let’s have a party and review them, see how much we spent for the same advice and how much was spent ignoring the advice over the past 60 years.

Five: Conventional wisdom has it that the city would like to become a landlord again, taking a taxable property into the non-taxable domain, and would prefer to open a restaurant. The city fathers like being in business on taxpayer largess. Why is it vogue for government of the people, by the people, for the people to become government of the government, by the government, for the government? Maybe they just like to see their names on plaques.

Six: I don’t loiter, but I

recognize some of the loiterers

on that corner. We give each other hugs and hellos as I traverse their “territory.” This sidewalk corner, it seems, is the lower Central gathering

spot for persons living on less-than-average income, who welcome a spot to visit outside their less-than-average living accommodations. They are of the neighborhood. Are some nefarious? I couldn’t tell. They are all polite, unless they are terribly tipsy, and then they tend to repeat themselves.

A footnote: I have a friend in a major American city who headed restoration of a historic district. The way this person avoided vandalism was to give the vagrants blankets and keep them comfortably supplied with vittles and wine in exchange for watching over the city’s six blocks of restoration. Nary a scratch on any building.

Both the very good and the very bad in our society are not comfortable with vagrants. I am not suggesting this aforementioned program as a panacea, just to note that loiterers and vagrants may not be loved, but they are not necessarily unkind or useless.

Want to clear up the problem? Install better lighting, and hand out loitering tickets for starters. However, that is a city problem. Loitering is not the responsibility of a downtown merchant. Giving the city fathers another excuse to play merchants without the private headache of coming up with their own money is unfair to the little neighborhood this market has served for eons, and importantly, not fair to a hardworking business family.

City, do your job! Let the merchant do his.

• Nancy Matthews is a Tracy resident and has worked at the Tracy Press for nearly 60 years.
Comments
(18)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
lifelongtracyite
|
July 12, 2011
You know some of you have legitiment points about the loitering and vagrants outside the store. I for one cant stand for bums to ask me for money when im entering a store. Or to have to walk through a crowd of people standing around without an actual purpose of being there. But at the same time that your tunnel vision focuses on on the locals who frequent the outside of this establishment do not be blinded to the fact that some of you hipacrits do the same at ur conveinence. If your wondering what i mean just go there on an evening when the grand is having a show and watch as intermission comes and you will see the majority of show watchers file into westside market and buy the alcolholic beverages and proceed to casually consume them on the public street while waiting to reenter their show. Why is it acceptable behavior for show goers to break the law. Loitering is loitering whether you do it on a daily basis or on at your showtime conveinence. Also as far as i knew its never been legal to consume alcohol on a public side walk. Lets not fail to see all the contributions.
LuckyInTracyNot
|
June 05, 2011
I agree that the gangs and other miscreanted lowlife selfish parrasites have the top priority in the polices attention.
pinkwillow
|
June 05, 2011
The problem with enforcing codes that have no punishment is that we take a cop off the street for several hours to give these bums a ride to jail where they get a shower and a free meal, then get sent back to Tracy clean with a meal inter belly.

If I don't have a job, or a place to live, and my main goal for the day is to beg or steal enough money to get drunk. I don't think a shower and a free meal is going to deter me to much.

Plus, when we have shrinking resources, (police officers, ambulance crews, fire fighters) I for one would much rather they focus on arresting Gang members, drug dealers and I know I want a ambulance and fire truck heading to my house as soon as I call, rather than them going to a drunk passed out in an alley.

I pay for those services for me and my family, not for them to help those that don't want to help themselves.
pinkwillow
|
June 05, 2011
The problem with enforcing codes that have no punishment is that we take a cop off the street for several hours to give these bums a ride to jail where they get a shower and a free meal, then get sent back to Tracy clean with a meal inter belly.

If I don't have a job, or a place to live, and my main goal for the day is to beg or steal enough money to get drunk. I don't think a shower and a free meal is going to deter me to much.

Plus, when we have shrinking resources, (police officers, ambulance crews, fire fighters) I for one would much rather they focus on arresting Gang members, drug dealers and I know I want a ambulance and fire truck heading to my house as soon as I call, rather than them going to a drunk passed out in an alley.

I pay for those services for me and my family, not for them to help those that don't want to help themselves.
TommyJamaca
|
June 05, 2011
Harass their customer base till they close their doors? Yikes! I'm glad luckyintracy is n-o-t in making the calls.
LuckyInTracyNot
|
June 05, 2011
pinkwillow you are correct but, another way to approach this is to continue enforcing the loitering codes until they get tired of it and move to there own back yard or stay at home.

make what was once an attractive thing to do more unattractive by the police.
ILovePeppermint
|
June 04, 2011
pinkwillow,

San Joaquin County closed the District Attorney's office on Tenth Street. If you drive past you will see there is a For Lease sign there now.

pinkwillow
|
June 04, 2011
It is not up to the street cops or the administration. They arrest the BUMS, and nothing happens because the district attorney will drop the charges. And the BUMS are right back in front of west side market before the paperwork is done. The district attorneys office has been so wiped out from budget cuts that very few misdemeanors get charged.

If you want scum to go away then you have to remove what attracts them. There is no other way. And yes they are scum. No jobs, no taxes paid but yet they are draining our

resources. Absolutely no contribution to society what so ever.
LuckyInTracyNot
|
June 04, 2011
@ rotten, Giving loiters blankets and wine is insane.

I agree with you here but, I also go along with the saying 'if you can not beat the situation, make the situation work for you'. Apparently this person is doing just that. Until the calvery arrives at a later date I guess.

As for TRACY'S vagrants and gangs / trouble makers / car stereo noise violators, it is up to THE CITY LEADERS in city hall and THE TOP POLICE ADMINISTRATION to set the example and map out the plans to get this element off of our streets and communities and let them know that we don't want their stupid un acceptable selfish good for nothing life styles here which keeps us from going to places in Tracy and enjoy family time. It really urks me and this escapes me as to how and WHY THE CITY let this issue go on for AS LONG AS IT DID without even recognizing the growing active danger in Tracy.

It is up to our street cops BUT it is up to their boss who needs to reassure to them they will back them up on this as well when addressing these street punks.

LuckyInTracyNot
|
June 04, 2011
If...if you are going to attack the vagrants who hang-out in the general West Side Market area then, you need to attack those in the other areas of town as well. Of course we are not talking about those areas but still. Take a look at Parker Avenue market, Sunset Liquors on Parker & Grantline, Arco Station and that Liquor Store on 11th Street north of the projects and west of tracy Blvd. Look at Stop & Go on Lincoln Blvd.

West Side market has been here for years and years and survived where others have changed hands and fail. It does have some spooky looking folks there from time to time but I feel safer there than some of the other places. Actually I get a 'hey whutsup or how are you' in a non threatening voice from any of them.

I have mixed feelings on this. I think West Side market should stay put, period. But I am also for a more attractive Tracy that is a safer place to live and walk and enjoy my family (not that this market is a danger to that) but I think gangs and trouble makers and loud disruptive miscreants should be the first to be addressed, add some tailgaters and road ragers to that while the cops are at it.

W.S. Market is part of the historic Tracy we know.
pinkwillow
|
June 04, 2011
Westside market has a bad reputation because they frequently sell alcohol to the drunks in town. The drunks know this and loiter in the front of the store asking for money from people walking by. They get their alcohol and pass out in the area. This is a problem.

Vagrants ARE Not only useless but they are a drain on city resources. And a drain on my taxpayer dollar. The frequent ambulance rides, hospital visits and calls to the police I have to pay for, not them.

Maybe the author can give these wonderful people blankets and booze and let them live in the Tracy press building, just to protect it from vandalism of course.
baragon
|
June 03, 2011
While considering the revitalization and transformation of a Bay Area city downtown a city councilman said, "You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear". This statement might be an appropriate response to all the tax-funded time, money, and attention being spent on the "downtown" here in Tracy. Is it really possible to create a downtown like Pleasanton or Livermore here in Tracy? Does anyone, especially our local officials really know what's needed for such a change? Or, better yet why would a change be necessary at all? I get tires there at Big O, and at times I have dinner at the Great Plate. I definitly go to La Esperanza when I want Mexican take out. Other than that I have no need to be downtown. I don't feel like I am missing anything by not having a downtown like Pleasanton or Livermore. I prefer having more cops and fireman paid for by my taxes than a change in the downtown. Only one man's opinion.
rotten
|
June 03, 2011
For a thriving downtown area, you need consumers...Most of the Tracy residents commute to work and therefore there is no lunch/dinner crowd to provide the rush which merchants need to thrive. I mean think about it, how many thriving downtown areas do you know that have a train station in the center of town and a gang infested area on the "other side of the tracks"?? Lets not forgot that we have an overcrowded state prison down the street. The parolees use the train/greyhound to travel. I think the train station was a waste of money!!!! As for the market, why does Tracy P.D. allow loitering in the first place??? Loitering is a downtown merchants responsibility to notify law enforcement to remove these individuals who are hampering their business. Giving loiters blankets and wine is insane. Unfortunately, I don't see an answer to making Tracy retail success. Tracy is a drive thru town. You drive thru to get gas, go to the bathroom or grab fast food and proceed on... So what is the answer? A water park or a park to rent paddle boats, do some fishing, walk, run, have picnics, concerts, or festivals, a zoo. It can create cash flow and become attractive to travelers and us.
victor_jm
|
June 03, 2011
Ultimately, the City is motivated to provide a downtown which may be enjoyed by all, which may inconvenience some. Also, downtown neighborhoods are often disrupted by the traffic and litter of gathering citizens who think their social lives ought to be organized by the City.

Who wins?

victor_jm
|
June 03, 2011
Places like the Westside Market pander to many indolent, ignorant people who are willing to habitually spend more than they should on items they really need less of. There are very few healthful items in this establishment. The downtown area may want a small, convenient store, but this store is in the wrong place, particularly if you wish to make the Grand Theater experience more pleasurable.

First, the author of this article knows she isn’t an “unsavory character,” so dispense with this argument. Second, because the store serves the author isn’t an argument for its retention. Third, because something is “historic” doesn’t mean it ought to be preserved for eternity. Fourth, if I am someone living on a “less-than-average income,” I don’t squander money on items I may purchase at another location for less. Fifth, loitering is everyone’s problem, but some proprietors aren’t too concerned with the (in)activity because they know the bulk of their sales occur as a result of indiscretion or vice.

A store of this kind may be a benefit or a detriment, given the demographics of the area. Well, it is a detriment.

Ultimately, the City is motivated to provide a downtown which may
dcose
|
June 03, 2011
why? wrote on Friday, Jun 03 at 07:41 AM »

"...What is the average that a business downtown lasts? 2-3yrs MAX!"

Thank you again for the emoters point of view. Could you provide the data supporting your contention? Each time I've requested it, the God of electrons seems to devour it.

"City hall is one reason that downtown merchants fail."

Could you elaborate on how City Hall contributes to business failure? Thank you in advance.
why?
|
June 03, 2011
It is WRONG when government un-fairly uses public money to compete with private business. This is the current plan being forced on the downtown merchants. City Hall is now the competition.
why?
|
June 03, 2011
Wonderful observation! The trouble with city hall is the US and Them game plan. Using the West Side Market as the scapegoat for all the EVIL and Crime in the downtown area. It is not true, never has been true and yet it is the subject of all the city council, planning and back door meetings of Leon, Brent and Scott.

How do they decide that the tire store and the market are disposable business, not worthy of the real estate.

West Side Market is a service to the people of the downtown area. The fact that is has stayed in business for more than 30yrs proves that it is a viable, private merchant. City Hall should leave them alone!

What is the average that a business downtown lasts? 2-3yrs MAX! City hall is one reason that downtown merchants fail. Many hopeful merchants have went down the bankruptcy path. Lead to believe that city hall will be the reason people will shop downtown. Hogwash!

Less government is private business, the better. Leon, provide a real police officer downtown, safety and service is your job. Don't blame the merchants. Do your job...


We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.