Ethics & Values: Pornography and personhood
by Mike McLellan
Nov 03, 2009 | 1054 views | 3 3 comments | 19 19 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Pornography reduces people to one or two anatomical parts.

Anything that diminishes or cuts complex human beings into fractions is ultimately evil.

We are not just our race, sexuality, ethnicity or religion. We are whole, complete persons who deserve the right

to be encountered as individuals.

Women have long argued that they have been treated as things. They were once considered as chattel or possessions of their fathers or husbands. Today, equal treatment means being seen as whole, multifaceted persons with unique gifts to offer.

As a college male, I was willing, even eager, to be reduced to a sex object. As I have grown older (so that people sometimes view me as a Jell-O mold or an ancient rock), I have grown to resent it. I am more than my age, handicaps or beltline.

This condensing of people to a single aspect of their lives is at the heart of what divides us. When we truly encounter others as real people, we see them as complex beings not so unlike ourselves.

There are always those heartwarming stories about quiet in the midst of war when greetings or humanizing conversations bridge the gap between the battle lines. While these stories usually conclude with the restoration of hostilities, they point to how really getting to know someone makes them less of an object and harder to diminish.

Pornography is a major example of something that objectifies women and men. Women especially see how it eroticizes their domination and humiliation. It reinforces sexual and cultural attitudes that are found in sexual harassment and rape.

When individuals are seen only as things, we see the worst that humanity can do. The Holocaust, Sept. 11, sexual abuse and genocide in the Sudan are just a few examples.

This also goes for the soft-core porn that can be found in many magazine advertisements. Pushing the product is obviously more important than the people. Automotive magazines have long been a major culprit, as have women’s fashion magazines.

We ought to get as indignant about the subtle subversion of individuals as we are about the blatant depiction of sex. This multibillion-dollar industry is dehumanizing to both those who are depicted and those who are mesmerized by it.

• Mike McLellan can be contacted by calling and leaving a message at 830-4201 or e-mailing him at DrMikeM@sbcglobal.net.
comments (3)
« FrostySnowball wrote on Sunday, Nov 15 at 02:03 PM »
TracyGuy,

What part of "air-brush" don't you understand?
« TracyGuy95376 wrote on Tuesday, Nov 10 at 09:55 AM »
While I applaud the writer for having a personal opinion, I do not agree with him forcing it on the readers. Granted, I'm not obligated to read his story, yet his opinion is there. I guess I am tired of the arrogance of every single person that writes stories like these. "I have an opinion, and because it's something I believe it must be 100% right, and every one else is 100% wrong- so let me spout my nonsense to the world as though they care what I have to say". If pornography is not your thing, then avoid it. Don't try to have it removed from the shelves because you aren't strong enough to avoid it any other way. Your proposed solution will do nothing to solve this alleged problem, because objectification comes from a person- it's how you view a situation or a person. They aren't objectified just because they are on the magazine cover- they are objectified by the reader- which is where your real problem lies- not with pornography. It exists because there is a market for it, and a fanbase. If you aren't a fan, move along grandpa.
« victor_jm wrote on Wednesday, Nov 04 at 03:08 PM »
Well, I think the thrust of our economy is about reducing people to fractions. Also, I can't say that I have ever met a "whole" person.

Still, what is a "whole" person? I suspect a whole person can be either good or evil.

Also, I'm not a consumer of pornography, but I have seen some "evil" pictures of naked women. Nevertheless, I always thought there were at least five anatomical parts to their fractional representation.


We encourage your online comments in this public forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a forum for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Readers may report such inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.