Clearing up the corner
by Denise Ellen Rizzo / Tracy Press
Jun 25, 2012 | 6685 views | 17 17 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The owner of the building at 10th Street and Central Avenue has until July 5 to make structural reinforcement repairs to the building.  Glenn Moore/Tracy Press
view slideshow (6 images)
A fenced-off building on the northeast corner of Central Avenue and 10th Street could be taken over by the city if the structure’s owner fails to resolve safety issues by next week.

According to Tracy code enforcement officer Ana Contreras, the southern and western walls need to be reinforced by owner Denise Hembree before fences can be removed from the building that once houses Helm’s Ale House. The structure has been closed since Oct. 31, when the city ruled it was not safe for inhabitation.

“We agreed to give them 10 days, from tomorrow to July 4, to do all structural reinforcements to ensure the building is safe,” Contreras said. “We worked out an agreement, but we’re holding steadfast. If repairs are not made in the given time, receivership process is the immediate next step.”

If the shoring up project passes city inspection on the morning of July 5, Contreras said the city would grant Hembree an unlimited time period to complete the needed interior repairs.

Hembree said Monday, June 25, that workers will start shoring up the walls Tuesday, June 26.

“My goal all along has been to get the building up and operational as soon as possible,” Hembree said. “I’m happy some progress seems to be being made here.”

Code enforcement officers reportedly identified six damaged trusses above the adjacent former Mexican market, which shared a roof with the restaurant and the restaurant’s northern wall. A week after the restaurant’s closure, a chain link fence was erected around the building by city order, citing a possible danger to the public.

The fence surrounding the building could be removed if work meets city standards, Contreras said. She said it has always been the city’s intention to get the building repaired and back on the market for occupancy.

Even if the work goes well, the fence might not be removed in time for the Fourth of July parade. But the possibility of its removal received applause from the Tracy City Center Association.

TCCA District Manager Janis Couturier said it would be nice to have the fence down in time for the car show sponsored by the partnership of downtown property owners on July 21, which will include activities at that intersection. She said TCCA was aware there had been activity on the building’s repair process, but the organization never received a final word on a deadline.

She hopes to make the car show a signature event for the downtown, replacing the spring wine stroll. She said current plans for the car show include activities spread out from the Central Avenue and 10th Street intersection to the Sixth Street plaza.

Comments
(17)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Realintracy
|
June 28, 2012
The City closed that place 8 months ago and fenced off the street. Hembree was given deadline after deadline and thumbed her nose. Now they gave her another one, and gave her concessions, and she will just do the same thing.

Why hasn't she been issued a citation at least? If you park you car on the street too long they give you a ticket and will tow your car. She has had 10th and Central blocked for months with no consequences.

Are there different rules for influential olde Tracy citizens and the rules for the "commoners", those that are not on the Board of Directors for TCCA? Sure looks that way.

Sneaky
|
June 27, 2012
I am going to disagree a bit with some of the comments below. It is good that the city is forcing her to complete the structural repairs, since that is a safety hazard. As for the unlimited time to fix the inside I dont see how anyone can object to that. Its her property. As far as I am concerned, she can fix it, not fix it, or live in it. Not repairing the inside and renting it again hurts only the owner.
behonestguys
|
June 28, 2012
I can respect your point Sneaky, but also look at it this way - if Denise just does the bare minimum, then you may have a building that is structurally safe that is boarded up, thereby contributing to the blight of the downtown area, which everyone is trying to improve. The added flavor of a cow and pig painted on the old Mexican market side of the building doesn't help either. Perhaps Denise just needs to sell the building to someone who will have a pride of ownership in it (and the $$)to fix it up, and make that corner of town a little nicer.
beepbeepcomingthrough
|
June 27, 2012
Hembree doesn't have the money to keep up with the upgrades. She has been awarded this property and thinks it is worth more than it is. The city needs to step in an demo the building and let a small business owner take ownership of the property and put a new building on the parcel that will have a new and vibrant appeal for the downtown area. We need less downtown owners like Hembree and more owners like the ones who surround her buildings with in a stones throw.
C3TJ
|
June 26, 2012
Unlimited time? Since Hembree is waiting until a week before the deadline to start the work, I would strongly recommend the city impose a deadline to complete repairs or we can all see how this is going to end up.
newtotracy
|
June 26, 2012
"unlimited" time to do the inside? I'm all for a nice relaxed remodel, but this is someone who's already had 8 months to do ANYTHING and has done naught. How about we set a timeline so that something gets done. Otherwise we'll just have an empty building with no fence.

C'mon city...you gave ME a time limit on permits that I filed...let's see some equality...just because she owns a more valuable property doesn't make her a more important person. Shoot...at least MY property isn't an eyesore!!! To me...that gives me a leg up on Hembree!

And Santana Row downtown? Gag. We've got houses sitting empty in this town but you want to build more? C'mon guys...let's think outside the box...we don't need more empty homes!
RedHotChilliPeppers
|
June 26, 2012
newtotracy,

How many homes do you think are for sale in Tracy?
newtotracy
|
June 26, 2012
don't know how many are for sale...what I addressed is empties...not unsolds. Look around on the side streets downtown...I've seen a handful or more of homes that are boarded up...and lately a lot of "for rent" signs. The new trend isn't to buy...it's to rent. Between people having crap credit after the games the credit card companies played over the past few years (not to mention the mortgage stuff)...and the mortgage issues decreasing trust in lenders...people are renting again, yet Tracy has empties.

Let's fill the warehouses and empty shops...then maybe when people work there, they'll need homes and we can work on that.
RedHotChilliPeppers
|
June 26, 2012
newtotracy,

There are about twenty to forty for sale.

The reason there are empties downtown is because Measure A sent developers running from the core of the city.

It was supposed to help, but it ultimately hurt more than anything else.

Why would you rent a boarded up home downtown, when you can find something nicer elsewhere?

Warehouse jobs are no longer in California.

And why would a business want to move into an old shop with the roof falling down?
dcose
|
June 26, 2012
newtotracy also appears to be new to the housing market mechanics. There is no law that requires a lender/secured note holder to sell a property at any price.

Should you have special insight to that which the rest of us in the construction, real estate, and/or development industry are unaware of, please share
C3TJ
|
June 26, 2012
Actually, I just checked the MLS and there's 103 listings as of a minute ago in Tracy.
RedHotChilliPeppers
|
June 27, 2012
Thanks 3CTJ!

Apprecaite the update from MLS. Since I do not have access I can only watch trends from free websites to get a ballpark estimate.

Are all those 103 from inside city limits? Other websites show 100 to 200 but some are outside city limits, Mountain House etc.. probably some are already sold too.

Thanks again!
behonestguys
|
June 26, 2012
It's no surprise that Ms. Hembree has not stepped up to the plate sooner and taken responsibility of her building. Proof of that fact is that Dave Helm has had to sue her in court to be compensated for being put out of business due to Denise's acts and omissions as a landlord. His lawsuit is a public record with the San Joaquin County Superior Court. The case is Helm v. Hembree, Case No. 39-2012-00277757. I have read it, and am simply amazed by the allegations contained in that document, backed up by City documents.
amlee1978
|
June 26, 2012
It's ridiculous that the owner has taken this long to do something about this place. It's such an eyesore and the fence is really in the way of that part of the street! I hope something is done soon. I am glad the city is acting on it, but it will probably be at the tax payers expense, as usual. Thanks a lot Hembree.....
ChrisRoberts
|
June 26, 2012
Maybe we should get $erpa and $ouza to fix the property.

RedHotChilliPeppers
|
June 26, 2012
Chris,

I think it is a great idea. Tear it down and build apartments on top of shopping. Santana row style. Now you're thinking.


We encourage readers to share online comments in this forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a space for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Comments that stray from the topic of the story or are found to contain abusive language are subject to removal at the Press’ discretion, and the writer responsible will be subject to being blocked from making further comments and have their past comments deleted. Readers may report inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at tpnews@tracypress.com.