Polls

Forum Login






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

RSS Feed: Local News

feed image

RSS Feed: Sports

feed image

RSS Feed: Voice

feed image
Union bill hardly for farmworkers E-mail
Written by Calvin Dooley/Grocery Manufacturers/ Food Products Association   
Thursday, 21 June 2007

A letter from Calvin Dooley

One of the paramount principles of democracy is the freedom of citizens to cast a vote without fear of reprisal or intimidation. Every year, the U.S. sends delegations of elected officials, labor leaders and human rights activists to monitor elections in countries throughout the world to ensure their citizens have the right to cast a secret ballot. Labor organizations insist that every trade agreement the U.S. enters includes provisions that protect worker rights, including the right to vote on whether or not to organize without the fear of intimidation.

But for California farmworkers, the sanctity of the private ballot and the freedom to vote without fear and intimidation is under attack. Legislation is making its way through the state Capitol in Sacramento that would strip away a farmworker’s right to a private ballot election during union organizing drives, making the votes public. In place of the private ballot would be a new system, called card check.

Under the card check system, union organizers are simply required to collect signatures from a little more than half the employees of a given employer, through any means necessary.

Under this card check system, farmworkers would lose their absolute right under existing law to a secret ballot election, and their votes would be made public to the union, the employer and their co-workers. The card check system would leave farmworkers open to coercion, intimidation, bullying and harassment — not only from union representatives, but also from employers and co-workers.

Recent incidents highlight these problems. In February, the California Agricultural Labor Relations Board found that the United Farm Workers union deliberately misled Ventura farm workers when conducting a union organizing drive and threatened workers with employment termination if they didn’t join the union. In response, the state stepped in and issued a cease-and-desist order against the UFW. This is just one recent example of how fatally flawed the card check system is.

Ironically, it is the same organization that claims to protect farmworkers and their rights that is seeking to terminate the workers’ individual privacy and right to the secret ballot.

The proposed law is sponsored by the UFW. The organization that claims to protect farmworkers is seeking to terminate the workers’ individual privacy and right to the secret ballot. In this instance, the UFW is clearly not acting in the best interests of workers. The best interest of the individual worker is to continue to have secret ballot elections, supervised by the state, that protect individual worker choice and diminish the potential for intimidation by either the employer or the union. The card check system would give the ultimate power of serving as the registrar of voters to the union. This is a clear conflict of interest.

In an additional irony, the champion and iconic protector of farmworkers and UFW founder, Cesar Chavez, championed for the secret ballot election process. In fact, when the Agricultural Labor Relations Act was enacted in 1975, Chavez and the UFW fought for workers’ rights to secret ballot elections.

The private ballot is a protected right of all Americans, and a cornerstone of our democracy. It is the American standard at the ballot box, allowing voters to make tough and even controversial election choices without fear of reprisal or intimidation. That protected right is under attack in the Legislature, and California farm workers find themselves the target.

All workers deserve the right to a fair election process during organizing drives, and the private ballot is critical to the free expression of a worker’s choice to be represented by a union. Senate Bill 180 should be rejected.

Calvin Dooley, a Visalia Democrat who served in Congress from 1991 to 2004, is president and chief executive officer of Grocery Manufacturers/Food Products Association.

Trackback(0)
Comments (12)add
...
written by ilegal , June 21, 2007
tu calvin dooley;
thes law vedy bed law calvin.ilegal no allow tu vote.thes law prvant
usa frum voting.
...
written by bob blinker , June 21, 2007
secret vote is a bedrock principle. still the legislative bodies seem to often use voice votes, calls for votes, etc. so ther must be a balance, as usual. perhaps when the ufw board meets the vote should be public, probly already is. when leaders are elected, the vote should be secret.
...
written by T. Benigno , June 21, 2007
Mr. Dooley: You are so wrong about your whole analysis of the food industry and producers associations.


Benigno smilies/angry.gif
...
written by ilegal , June 21, 2007
mr.benigno;
yu nisa men. ilegal no gu tu schol.i nut have good educaton.i lurn tu
red good heh.Senor benigno yu no agri wit bod men hu du nut alow us tu vota.
yu won gud hombre.rispec yu vedy mucho. hav nisa seesta mi compadre.
ilegal.
...
written by T. Benigno , June 21, 2007
Thank you Mr. ilegal there are lot of nice people out there I'm glad to have you on the blog.
I don't sleep too well anymore,thank you anyway.

Tom
...
written by AE , June 21, 2007
How much did Dooley get for writing this article...since the workers are not obviousley being represented by his comments but instead he represents the industries who only want to pay minimum wage (or less if they can get away with it) and provide no benefits but have their workers toil in the hot sun with little to show for it.
...
written by T. Benigno , June 22, 2007
Good point Sir: I am a little taken back by this guy's review of his agenda. He probably never worked in any industry that had anything with farming or the grocery industry.

Farm workers don't want union dues, nor do they want to social security, they would rather have the money to send home to their families. The percentage that is taken out of their pay for FICA and SSI means more to them in cash. Which they may never collect?

Especially when the contractor deducts 35% for his share of the deal, that they don't even claim. They sometimes end up with 55 % of what they earn. The ability to vote what does that mean,for the workers that come here to work seasonally? Nothing.

The Baracero program allowed those wokers to come here under a program ,work and go home to their land and families.
Mr. Dooley represents the problems with immigration, that is false hope for these people who come here. To use them as cheap labor for the same Associations he represents.

They don't care about the worker? As a past farmer and grocery operator, I resent the fact that this guy was in Congress and now is a Chief executive officer, of an industry that has failed the Union members who wanted to make a career in the grocery industry. By cutting full time help so that they didn't have to pay benefits,and health care.

Tom Benigno
Owner operator C&T farms
Grocery Produce Outlets
...
written by Clarence Gillmore , June 23, 2007
Tom B. did you ever hire illegals? to work on your farm?

...
written by Dave Kerst , June 23, 2007
Tom B. do you support the Private Ballot?
...
written by Tom Benigno , June 23, 2007
To Mr.Gillmore: Yes sir, but they were allowed to enter the country under the bracero program. Yes again on another issue, the Triana family allowed some 150 illegals to stay on a ranch I rented from them next to my ranch. Being that they also had other apricot orchards, they used the same contractor. The contractor was responsible for the people they hired. I paid the contractor, not the people he was responsible for.

A neighbor saw the workers sleeping on cardboard on the ground and called immigration officials.
My wife an I were questioned by the FBI in 1976 about the issue. We explained the situation to the agent. The contractor was the violator of the program. He never had their visa's cleared by immigration. That was in 1976. Some paper work was authorized in those days.

Even the PCA, the Production Credit Association certified illegals into the country then to work in the fields. The money borrowed for crop production had provisions of who would be doing the harvesting, down to contractor names and how much per ton was to be paid. I hope that answers your question sir.

Tom Benigno
...
written by Tom Benigno , June 23, 2007
Dave : What private ballot are you asking about? The right to vote a union issue for the Chavez movement for farm workers? You need to be more specific on your question. What does that have to do with the your site 300 job. Are you recruiting illegals to join the Republican party and the military now?
...
written by Tom Benigno , June 25, 2007
Clarence Gillmore : I hope you got my answer that type of information I gave you is on record and confidential. Now my wife wants to know, what type of work do you do. You got the part of the story the other part is about local corruption that goes on.

Benigno
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Thursday, 21 June 2007 )