Search

Polls

Forum Login






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

RSS Feed: Local News

feed image

RSS Feed: Sports

feed image

RSS Feed: Voice

feed image
Finding a solution to foreclosure crisis E-mail
Written by Rep. Jerry McNerney / For the Tracy Press /   
Tuesday, 13 May 2008

The local congressman reviews what's being done to combat risky loans and help imperiled homeowners.



Americans all across the county are feeling squeezed by the subprime mortgage crisis. Nowhere is that feeling more acute than here in San Joaquin County, where we suffer from one of the nation’s highest foreclosure rates.

But more than just frequent headlines, national and even international attention, the foreclosure crisis means that families are losing their homes.

cartoonAnd there’s an even greater effect, as well. Foreclosures destabilize neighborhoods. For every foreclosure in a one-eighth square mile, the size of a typical city block, the value of every other home on that city block declines by 1 percent immediately, and the crime rate goes up 2 percent immediately.

It’s clear that the subprime crisis has caused hardship, not just for families that got in over their heads, but it has also caused an economic slowdown that hurts us all. 

The road to recovery starts with stabilizing the housing market, and just this past week, the House of Representatives passed a foreclosure prevention package that will benefit all Americans.

The House package is a fiscally responsible, 100 percent voluntary program that assists people who are trying to act responsibly but who can’t refinance because their homes are now worth less than the value of their mortgage. This is a difficult problem that lots of families in San Joaquin County have encountered because home values have dropped.   

To participate, lenders must write-down the value of a mortgage to better reflect current home prices, and the Federal Housing Administration will help the borrower refinance into a fixed-rate mortgage. Banks that gave out bad loans will have to accept responsibility for their actions by taking a loss. This is valid only for owner-occupied homes; speculators, investors and vacation/second-home owners are not eligible to participate.

Banks will have an incentive to participate, because they are better off taking a small loss now than a bigger loss later, and hundreds of thousands of homes may be saved. 

In addition to helping homeowners who are under water, the House-passed package helps restore community stability by providing funds for local communities to purchase vacant, foreclosed properties, rehabilitate them, and use them for affordable housing. 

I am also proud that a bill I wrote was passed as part of the package and will allow more homeowners to qualify for stable, government-insured mortgages by raising the size of mortgages that the FHA is allowed to insure. 

These represent reasonable, responsible steps to stabilize the housing market, help keep people in their homes and rebuild our economy.

After all, I think Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke put it best when he recently said, “High rates of delinquency and foreclosure can have substantial spillover effects on the housing market, the financial markets and the broader economy. Therefore, doing what we can to avoid preventable foreclosures is not just in the interest of lenders and borrowers. It’s in everybody’s interest.”

We still have a lot of work ahead of us, but we are making important progress. I hope that the Senate and the president put partisanship aside, support this legislation and join with us to protect homeownership and rebuild our economy.

• Rep. Jerry McNerney, D-Pleasanton, represents the 11th congressional district, which includes Tracy.

 

Trackback(0)
Comments (13)add
...
written by They're all over the place , May 14, 2008
another democrat with yet another dream???
...
written by Reward the Irresponsible , May 14, 2008
Let me get this straight - people who bought homes they couldn't afford or just decided to stop paying becuase their mortgage was under water are going to get their mortage principle reduced under the Demorats's plan and those responsible homeowners who made sure they could afford the home they purchased and have made all their payments on time while watching their property values plummet just get screwed. Very "fiscally responsible" and "reasonable" Mr. McNerney. This is exactly why you nor any other democrat will get my vote in this election or any time soon. Explain to me why my taxes will pay to bail out these dead-beats while my home in Tracy has dropped more tha 25% in value just since August? I couldn't get my home refinanced if my life depended on it, and there is no way my lender is going to reduce my principle to reflect current market value. Why? Because I have actually been responsible. You'll excuse me while I go throw up.
...
written by K.D. , May 14, 2008
I have to agree somewhat with Reward the Irresponsible.

There are a number of factors what have contributed greatly to the housing crisis.

1) Poorly educated consumers. These people were sold on the low 'teaser rates' (typically 1% - 3%) offered by "Option ARM", or "Pick-A-Pay" type mortgages. These were typically based on the MTA, or COFI indices. They signed on the dotted line without realizing how these loans work, and how to make the most out of such loans. These mortgages offer the choice of paying a fully amortized payment (principal and interest- aka P&I) based on a 30-year term, P&I based on a 15-year term, interest payment only, or the lowest possible payment- based on the low teaser rate. The payment based on the teaser rate adjusts annually, while the interest rate on the other 3 options fluctuates monthly.

By paying just the teaser rate payment, you aren't even paying the minimum INTEREST due, let alone ever paying off any principal. Any unpaid P&I is added back to the loan balance. This INCREASE is called negative amortization. So, not only did values begin to drop, principal balance increased, and equity decreased. These loans can be a good choice when the minimum payment option is used SPARINGLY. It wasn't designed for consumers to make the minimum payment forever, which is what people were doing.

2) Shady loan consultants. By selling their clients on these mortgages without educating them how the program works, they have set these consumers up for failure. Whether it was intentional or not, they have failed their clients. To not disclose how these loans work, and the pros and cons, is nothing short of unethical.
...
written by K.D. , May 14, 2008
Part II

3) Shady Borrowers. Oh yes- they exist. On stated-income loans, people could pretty much say anything. My job as an underwriter was to analyze certain risks. If the loan application made sense, and the borrower(s) stated income was commensurate with their line of work, it was approved. Often, the risks were mitigated by verified assets, or a low loan-to-value (LTV). But plenty of consumers planted a foot in their own financial grave by LYING about their income, assets, employment- or all of the above.

4) Lender Practices. I was a mortgage underwriter for a very large bank. In 2004 and 2005, we only used 4.25% as a qualifying rate for the Option ARM program. It wasn't until 2006 when Capital Markets mandated using the fully indexed rate (which is the index rate plus the margin) to qualify. This was typically around 8%-9%.

Oops.

By law, for every loan application received, there is a package of disclosures sent out, including a Consumer Handbook on Adjustable Mortgages. It's my opinion that most people do not read these documents. That's a shame.

There is no one group to blame. Those are just 4 examples. I'm not sure I agree with a 'bailout'. I am upside down on my own house. I've also been out of a job since early 2007 and am struggling to make it. But, I made my choices and I don't want to be bailed out.

We live by the choices we make. Good AND bad. This housing crisis is a cyclical thing. It happened in the 80's, and most people survived that. Many people blindly signed loan documents without knowing what they were doing. As prices climbed, people were scrambling to buy a house while they still could. Even lying on loan applications and doing whatever they could to get approved.

Are poor decisions made in desperation the government's fault?
...
written by hard to believe , May 14, 2008
moral hazard anybody ?

Reward the Irresponsible is right on the money. The truth is that the price of houses have to come down to be affordable again without signing up for a shady loan. I decided to not buy (when I could have) because prices did not make sense to me. Now politicians like Rep. Jerry McNerney plan to take my tax dollard to reward the irresponsible people who gambled on a house.
...
written by B-dub , May 15, 2008
When the housing crisis started, lenders should have worked with their present customers and worked out a deal to have them keep their homes. Maybe like retaining the interest rate they had in order for them to afford to keep their house. Lenders didn't do this, they lost money, and now the homes look like 3rd world shacks. So now you have two who have lost, the homeowner and the lender. No winners here.
...
written by Robgt , May 15, 2008
For the people who didnt really understand the subprime loans and are going to or allready have lost the homes, it's not good at all!!
For the people who figured it was a good way to make a fast buck and now your outdoors,,,, sucks to be you!!
The question is how to help out the people who were suckered into this without bailing out the greed ones.
...
written by Commentator , May 15, 2008
For more info on the subprime mess we have had I advise everyone
to look up:
The Glass Steagall Act of 1933 (Wikipedia)
and
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (Wikipedia)
For those of you who feel like throwin up from irresponsible borrowers and lenders I strongly advise you to know how this was possible when there was firm regulations of the commercial side of the banking industries in 1933. The Gramm Leach Bliley Act of 1999 helped the deregulation of the banking industries starting the "madness" we have today. We should bring back the "Glass-Steagall Act" and only lend to people who are responsible with their finances!
...
written by B-dub , May 15, 2008

Robgt, I agree with your response. Help those who actually were suckered into the subprime loans and to the greedy ones....so be it.
...
written by BarrKeeper , May 15, 2008
The math.......
1 homes already vacant ... solution ... fill the vacancy.
2 homes not already built. solution ... do not build anymore.
3 build more homes? ... go back to step #1
...
written by R U Kidding ME? , May 15, 2008
Look, I'm in the real estate world, and I'm still making some money, but I come accross things that I can't believe are happening. Is everyone aware that Lenders are still giving out pick a pay loans? I don't agree with bailing the public out. I am contantly coming accross people who are avoiding responsibility. They think that someone owes them, and are trying to get around the system. Many questions I get are considered MORTGAGE FRAUD. What should the government do. I think they have done enough. It's time for people to responsible for themselves. The government keeps setting up programs for the buyers who bought high. They are not the ones with the problem. The people in trouble are those who used their homes as ATMs. Almost everyone I have dealt with over the last year has pulled OVER 150K out of their equity within 2 years, and have nothing to show for it. Talk about over spending!
...
written by Backroom deals??? , May 15, 2008
Let's see if Gerrymander can ever come up with a plan that remotely makes sense???

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

NooooooooooooooooT!!!

smilies/cry.gif
...
written by Commentator , May 16, 2008
The Glass Steagal Act of 1933
(Regulating the madness)
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999
(Deregulating the madness)
Look it up and see for yourself!
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 13 May 2008 )