November 20, 2008 Tracy, CA

Search

Polls

Login






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

RSS Feed: Local News

feed image

RSS Feed: Sports

feed image

RSS Feed: Voice

feed image
Our Voice Print E-mail
Written by Press Editorial Board /   
Tuesday, 06 May 2008

 
A smaller impact on the Earth starts with us.

 


Earth Day has come and gone. But our carbon footprint remains.

For those 81,548 of us who live in Tracy, it’s a pretty big footprint, even though some of us faithfully fill our blue recycling bins and smugly turn off our computers every night — except when we have insomnia. Most of us drive gas-guzzling cars to work every day, and at least 70 percent commute way over the hill. And who among us braves the valley summer without air conditioning? 

Comparing carbon footprints To find out just how green or ungreen we are — or how much greenhouse gas we produce as individuals — there’s a proliferation of “carbon calculators” to be found online. The good news is that our personal carbon emissions have nothing to do with what we’re emitting from our bodies.

Nevertheless, think Bigfoot. On average, Americans generate 20 tons of carbon dioxide a year.

Granted, it’s a confusing time to live right now. On the one hand, we’re told to go out and spend-spend-spend our tax rebates/stimulus checks. On the other, we’re told to stay home, turn off our lights and live like monks. (New research from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology shows that Buddhist monks have smaller carbon footprints than even homeless people who live in shelters.)

The presidential candidates have all called for a significant reduction in U.S. greenhouse gas emissions — an 80 percent reduction by 2050 for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and 65 percent for John McCain. But how on God’s green earth are we supposed to meet those goals, especially with a projected increase of 40 million residential U.S. households by 2050? Just to stay at 2008 levels of CO2, average household emissions would have to fall by 1.5 tons a year.

Hang your clothes out to dry now, folks.

While our policymakers set goals and debate over alternative energy sources, it’s a good time to take some personal steps to conserve and change that flabby footprint. We know the drill, whether we grew up in the Depression, lived with someone who grew up in the Depression, grew up in the ’60s or live with someone who grew up in the ’60s.

We can wash our clothes with cold water, compost our trash, make our own baking-soda cleansers, trade in our SUVs for hybrids, give up meat, plant gardens, shop at the farmers market, join a carpool, take public transportation, ride a bicycle, take shorter showers, use tote bags for groceries, use cloth napkins and buy second-hand furniture.

Oh, and here’s one for all the coffee drinkers. No, don’t stop drinking the stuff. How about using your own coffee mug, rather than contributing to the 16 billion disposable paper cups thrown away in North America every year — enough cups, placed end to end, to wrap 57 times around the Earth?

Hey, if it helps lighten the load, it’s worth a try.

• The Tracy Press is printed on recycled newsprint.

 
Sources for calculating your footprint:

• www.earthlab.com

• www.greentagsusa.org

• www.carbonfund.org

• http://thenatureconservancy.net/popups/about/

 

Trackback(0)
Comments (10)add
0
...
written by kierkegaard , May 07, 2008
This article is trite. Our lives is based on economics and the point of economics is production, so we produce things from the profound to the silly. Our peril is more than superficial talk about a carbon footprint.
1339
...
written by Dave Hardesty , May 07, 2008
kierkegaard

I have to agree with you on this. I just completed running the "calculator guntlet" using the calculators recommended and the majority of the calculators listed on the first page dump derived by Google searching "carbon footprint calculators." The results of all of those calculators wasn't of much use as it appears my personal carbon footprint is anywhere between 3.5 to 14 tons with a total average of all becoming 9 tons.

The interesting thing is the article's statement that the Average American generates 20 Tons per year. Actually I consider myself to be the Average American so I am wondering why my carbon footprint, at it's maximum, is still significantly below that much larger number.

And given the fact many of us have been conserving for many years, as a result of higher and higher prices we pay for energy and food, I am wondering how much further the Average American can go. What next? Hold our breath until we pass out and quit eating entirely?

Dave Hardesty
0
...
written by JOE CONSERVATIVE , May 07, 2008
Earth day is a holiday for commies, hippies and liberals!

Whoever wrote this article must be somekind a commie, tree hugging, liberal! I know there's know such ridiculous claim like climate change and everything's fine. I listen to Rush Limbaugh and he says that these are claims are what Obama Clinton supporting tree hugging, commies want to shove down our throughts! I watch Bill Oriley and he never made any ridiculous claims like this! Why should I believe commies, liberals, tree huggers outrageous claims that there's some kinda "global warming". Until Rush Limbaugh and Bill Oriley says so I'm not gonna believe no stinkin lies that I'm
doing something to add to somekinda fairy tale like "pollution" and "global warming"! I'm gonna smoke my cigars, drive my SUV and truck and in fact I'm gonna drive more and keep my house as cold as I want in the summer just to make you commie, liberal, tree hugging hippies happy. Rush and BillO never talks about carbon what the heck is that? As a matr fact, I think those commie scientists that are talking about this stuff are smokin that stuff that's why they're getting these "fairy tales". Let's face it, it's not gettin any hotter and we don't need to do anything, everything's OK! I dare any liberal, tree hugging commie to come tell me that Rush Limbaugh or Bill Oriley supports these "Fairy Tales!" You know why these commies,liberals and tree huggers wants to tell you this lie? Because their communists and they want us to live like we're in good ol Commie Soviet Union! I'm gonna eat more burgers and red meat and when I go to the grocery store I'm gonna make sure I double bag my groceries with double plastics and paper and I'll go to the store in my SUV and drive more! Stinkin liberal commie tree huggers can't tell me what to do!
1053
...
written by amy , May 07, 2008
When will we, the people, show the corporations and Wall Street that they do not have a monopoly on "natural resource-people"? Every decision they make affects us, OPEC, for example. Gas prices are hurting everyone.

The people campaigning for presidential office sure used their "jets" alot?
1339
...
written by Dave Hardesty , May 07, 2008
amy

Not just the politicians running for president either. It seems that many of our "green" supporters, IE the Hollywood croud, also have tremendously high carbon foot prints as a result of flying all over the world to tell the rest of us minions how bad things are.

Don't tell me, show me. Don't preach to me unless you are following the perscription yourself. In other words, "Physician, heal thyself."

Personally I believe this is one of the biggest problems in this "global warming" fiasco.

Dave Hardesty
1053
...
written by amy , May 07, 2008
Right! Dave, even hypocrisy is evident in Hollywood. I found hypocrisy in the Presidential candidates showing concerns for the carbon footprint, greenhouse, global warming and climate change..and use these jets frequently.... (am waiting for new political jargon to cover this environmental change.)

The elite, what is their contribution when using their planes and jetboats, Hummer...as well as the Hollywood Stars have been doing?

You see, I was making reference to what the politicians say and practice the other ... like you said, Dave.

Liked your writings!

I even turn off all the power at the fuse box except for the refrigerator when I go to work, you'd be amazed how much you will save in cost.
461
...
written by Mark Davis , May 07, 2008
The important takeaway from calculators is that there should rightly be a cost associated with anything that affects the commons (air and water, for instance). If you attach a cost to the use of the commons, then you can create a marketplace that will result in efficient use of that resource. There are some interesting ideas built into this like changing tax structures to no longer tax productivity but instead to tax the impact of productivity on the shared commons (hang on to your hats for what that would do to airline ticket prices!).

For the individual, though, they are primarily an awareness builder as a source of moral reasoning about one's impact on the commons.
4212
...
written by DEMOCRATDAD , May 08, 2008
These companies import Middle Eastern oil:

Shell........................... 205,742,000 barrels

Chevron/Texaco........ 144,332,000 barrels

Exxon/Mobil.............. 130,082,000 barrels

Marathon/Speedway.. 117,740,000 barrels

Amoco............................62,231,000 barrels

Citgo gas is from South America , from a Dictator who hates Americans. If you do the math at $30/barrel, these imports amount to over $18 BILLION! (oil is now $90 - $100 a barrel

Here are some large companies that do not import Middle Eastern oil:

Sunoco.................0 barrels
Conoco..................0 barrels
Sinclair.................0 barrels
BP/Phillips.............0 barrels
Hess.......... ...........0 barrels
ARC0.....................0 barrels

1053
...
written by amy , May 08, 2008
Sure wished the price of gas is 14 cents a gallon...Venenzuela's price!
1053
...
written by amy , May 08, 2008
"There has been speculation in recent days concerning the oil price, one of the most authoritative predictions so far has the price of crude oil at $200 within as little as six months.

The prediction by Goldman Sachs was made as benchmark US light crude passed the $123 mark for the first time. Surging demand was increasingly likely to create a “super-spike” past $200 in six months-to-two years’ time, said Goldman Sachs.

Oil prices have now risen by 25% in the last four months and 400% since 2001. Soaring global demand for oil is being led by China’s continuing economic boom and, to a lesser extent, by India’s rapid economic expansion...."

http://priceofoil.org/2008/05/08/oil-price-may-hit-200-a-barrel/

The price of oil is rising faster than Sach Goldman Sachs' predictions.


This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Thursday, 08 May 2008 )