Search

Polls

Forum Login






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

RSS Feed: Local News

feed image

RSS Feed: Sports

feed image

RSS Feed: Voice

feed image
Governor’s Budget Proposal Hurts Clinics E-mail
Written by David Quackenbush /   
Monday, 21 January 2008
A commentary on the proposed state budget by David Quakenbush of the Central Valley Health Network.

As the massive budget deficit casts an ominous shadow over the state, Californians brace themselves for tough times as Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger proposes budget cuts to Medi-Cal and some of the state’s most vital health care programs that provide critical services to millions of people throughout the state.

Adopting the mantra of “fiscal responsibility” to shield himself from taking any real responsibility, the Governor has called for dramatic cuts to funding that supports community clinic grant programs that include Expanded Access to Primary Care, Seasonal/Agricultural/Migratory Workers and Rural Health Services Development, all of which provide crucial services to the people of the Central Valley.

The governor’s proposed budget translates to a 15 percent cut ($4.5 million reduction) to the EAPC program, a 10 percent cut (from $6.9 million) to the SAMW program, and another 10 percent cut (from $8.2 million) to the RHSD program. These cuts will directly impact the community health centers that provide crucial health care services through these grant programs, and sadly the effects of these cuts will be clearly illustrated in the tens of thousands of patient visits throughout the state that will no longer be covered by these programs.

And as these particular programs are tailored to help meet the specific needs and unique characteristics of regions like the Central Valley, at the end of the day, the real cuts cannot be measured by a budget line item but in the quality of life for valley residents.

There is no doubt that at the end of the budget process many programs that provide critical services and help define the future of California will be casualties of the governor’s budget cuts. However, it is important for our policy-makers to recognize that some services and programs like those carried out by community health centers are simply services/programs that California cannot afford to cut, as they not only provide cost-effective primary and preventative health care services, but also provide tremendous cost savings to the state and counties they operate in.

Interestingly enough, these budget cuts, which sends a crippling blow to the work being done by community health centers, comes at a time when the governor is looking for support for health care reform legislation that he has negotiated with Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez, D-Los Angeles.

It is difficult to reconcile the actions of the governor’s budget cuts to the rhetoric his administration often uses when stressing the importance of passing health care reform legislation that will attempt to meet the needs of the 6.7 million uninsured individuals in the state, when at the same time his budget proposal cuts the very same funds to community health centers that already provide access to valuable health care services to approximately 3.6 million uninsured people in California — more than 50 percent of the state’s uninsured population.

Perhaps during this critical time when the state’s fiscal outlook is bleak our policy-makers should take a closer look at investing resources into programs and services, such as those carried out by community health centers, that have a proven track record of providing cost-effective solutions to the state, along with increasing the quality of life and wellness for millions of Californians.

David Quackenbush is chief executive officer of the Central Valley Health Network.
Trackback(0)
Comments (4)add
...
written by scott hurban , January 21, 2008
I guess it's time for such clinics to develop some good old fashion fundraisers like churches, civic clubs, and private charities have always had to do. Everyone has a reason why their program ought not to be cut, but someone elses should.
Get this. There isn't any money! When there isn't any money you have to make do with what you have or find ways of raising it from some other source. The gracy train has left the station.
...
written by Mark Davis , January 21, 2008
There is certainly merit to prioritizing how to make budget cuts. For instance, insofar as losing these public health programs translates into a massive cost shift to hospitals, that needs to prioritized against things like urban redevelopment investments.

Ultimately, though, I think we need to revisit the tax structure of California to try to rebalance the system to reduce the boom-and-bust cycle. And hopefully without raising the average tax load!
...
written by amy , January 22, 2008
This does not abode well for the rest of us. Those with contagious illnesses will not be able to seek medical help, thus exposing more of it to the rest of the population.... sure does not look well for us.
...
written by Steve Reshakis , January 22, 2008
Expanded Access to Primary Care, Seasonal/Agricultural/Migratory Workers and Rural Health Services Development, all of which provide crucial services to the people of the Central Valley. this is "code" for freebies for illegals...

Quackenbush is a Moron and a Liar.
Fiscal responsability is never wrong...it is always the right thing to do.

Arnold sold His soul to coddle the California Left and gave them everything they wanted, now we are plunging into deeper debt, and disaster...and what do the Quacks say? it's Arnold's Fault!
Our Clinics are in danger because they will all be Bankrupted by the NANY-State. thanks Democrats...this fall justly into your Commie Laps...
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy