Search

Polls

Forum Login






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

RSS Feed: Local News

feed image

RSS Feed: Sports

feed image

RSS Feed: Voice

feed image
Iraq war report card mixed E-mail
Written by Mickey McGuire / For the Tracy Press /   
Saturday, 01 December 2007

The Town Crier rates tactical, economic and political progress.



During the past few years, the Brookings Institution has produced a regular report about progress in Iraq. The most recent edition, released in October, displays charts of military, economic and other types of change. As in past reports, the results are mixed, but there are also signs of real improvement.

Casualties of Americans and Iraqis have been higher in 2007 than in any other year. Hidden within this grim fact, however, is some welcome news. It turns out that the first few months of the year were among the most violent of the war. Nonetheless, during the past six months, there has been a dramatic downward trend in deaths and injuries among both soldiers and civilians.

During November 2006, for example, 3,500 Iraqi civilians were killed. In recent months, that number has fallen to about 1,600.

There also appears to be a precipitous drop in bombing casualties. In January, 704 civilians were killed and 1,600 injured in bombing incidents. Recently, the monthly numbers declined to 190 killed and 443 injured.

There are several explanations for the decline in the number of casualties. First, Gen. David Petraeus’ surge strategy in Baghdad appears to have paid off. Security in that city has improved. The drop may also be attributed to a decline in ethnic conflict between the Sunnis and Shiites. It is possible that mixed neighborhoods have simply been “cleansed” of minorities so that the remaining communities are predominantly one ethnic group. There is no one left to kill.

A more positive development is that many Sunnis are turning away from al-Qaida. It appears that many tribal leaders in Anbar are not comfortable with the Taliban-like policies of al-Qaida’s followers. They also fear that their leadership in the region is threatened. Petraeus says that this development took him by surprise. It turns out that one of our main allies in Iraq is al-Qaida. Its extremist policies are alienating potential supporters.

Finally, there has been a dramatic decline in U.S. casualties from improvised explosive devices. The 82 American soldiers killed in May by IEDs fell to 25 deaths in September. Some experts think that Iran, where the more sophisticated devices are manufactured, may be responding to U.S. warnings by cutting off supplies.

Some economic indicators have been surprisingly resistant to change. Oil production peaked at 2.5 million barrels per day before the war. Four-and-a-half years later, production hovers around 2 million barrels a day. Electricity production is still 1,000 megawatts short of the 2004 goal of 6,000 megawatts.

Unemployment remains extraordinarily high. For the past 2½ years, the unemployment rate of 25 to 40 percent hasn’t changed. Remarkably, the per capita income of Iraqis has improved during the past several years. It is anyone’s guess about what will happen to Iraq’s economy after the U.S. ceases to spend so much in the country.

There is reason to be cautious about the military progress during the past few months. The trend has been positive for only six months and could moderate or reverse. Casualty rates have improved, but they are still high.

Some might conclude that we are winning and that victory is just beyond our grasp. Clearly, our tactical situation has improved, but wars are not won because the body counts have become more favorable. All wars are fought for political reasons. Winning must be defined by whether we have achieved our political objectives.

Petraeus’ reason for the recent surge was to give the Iraqis space to move toward reconciliation of the Kurds, Sunnis and Shiites. Yet the U.S. Government Accountability Office says that only three of 18 benchmarks set by the U.S. have been met. Nearly half of the cabinet members have pulled out of the government, and several parties have boycotted the legislature in the past six months. The Iraqi government has yet to develop an oil-sharing law or an amnesty program.

Last week, Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, the past commander of coalition forces in Iraq, said, “The improvements in security produced by the courage and blood of our troops have not been matched by a willingness on the part of Iraqi leaders to make the hard choices necessary to bring peace to their country.”

The tactical section of the Iraq report card shows improvement, the economic section is mixed, but the most important part, the political section, must read, “needs improvement.”

• Mickey McGuire, a retired high school social studies teacher, is among a select group of local residents rotating their columns in the Sunday Tracy Press.

 

 

Trackback(0)
Comments (9)add
...
written by Mark Davis , December 01, 2007
Nice, balanced treatment with a careful respect for facts, as always, Mickey. One can only hope that the divisiveness of the political factions will ultimately be overcome by a desire for peace on the part of their electors. One can only hope...
...
written by k.l.vosburg , December 02, 2007
Where's the obligatory media misanthrobes who claim nothing positive is ever reported out of Iraq? smilies/cry.gif
...
written by Steve Reshakis , December 02, 2007
Hey Mark! don't you and Mickey dislocate your arms patting yourselves on the Back.

I find it very funny when Liberals make these weak attempts at "adjusting" their War forecasts.

We are winning the War in Iraq.
The Surge worked!
You were wrong, Mickey is wrong...

Bush Was and is Right.

The Pinko Commies still get "F"s...
...
written by Mark Davis , December 02, 2007
Ouch, my arm! I could easily say the same thing about political divisiveness in the US!
...
written by mickey mcguire , December 02, 2007
Steve, Your comment attacks people, rather than what was written, labels rather than responds in a thoughtful, adult way. Why not single out something that you disagreed with, provide a fair quote, and then make a different argument. I would be interested in reading a contrary opinion.



...
written by k.l.vosburg , December 03, 2007
post script from the Ziegfeld follies:
"War Over!"
"hippies, pinkos, and commies all surrender!"
"yippie!!"

Let me zee..., vor voize, tone und pitch I gibt du un "E."
...
written by yahoo , December 04, 2007
I posted this as well on another forum....

written by yahoo , December 04, 2007
What's up people? Why are we so divided in America? I'm a minority and I know my place. I know it so well that I became a citizen to shed the old and to become new, to enjoy the privileges driving my car, to eat anywhere I want to eat, to wear any clothes I desire, to take any jobs that I feel that is good for me and my family, to enjoy the freedom to walk, to vacation anywhere in the states without questions, blah blah blah blah……so many complaints so many inconsiderate people. No wonder other countries see America as pigs, babies, whiners, no organization, so much division that we forget what America means to me. Even I can't comprehend what it's like to be full American and yet we take it for granted. War is a must to protect our land, our security, or freedom, our children, our families. There is no way around it. I don’t like wars, I don’t like the killing.
...
written by yahoo , December 04, 2007
written by yahoo , December 04, 2007
Sometime I don’t know enough what goes on capital hill. But man at least I admit it. We elect these people because they do know. Let them take care of it. We might not like all the issues surround this, and might not even make sense, and yet hearing from a lot of you make its seems like you guys know exactly what is going on there and have the answers!? Well why are you voicing it here? Why not become senates? Why not run for something if you REALLY know the answers. Yes we have opinions, let it be so but we should all still stand strong on what we need this country to be…BACK ON TRACK.

...
written by yahoo , December 04, 2007
written by yahoo , December 04, 2007
Do you really think that if we say "Ok world, we will end all wars, weapons, nukes in our land. No more guns and military and we hope that we will lead by example"

As naïve as we are, and I know we are very naïve…do you think they will follow suite? What are the odds of them saying "yes we will follow suite!"….yet somewhere in the hills the other countries are stashing their weapons for an attack…

Just a minority who is proud to be an American, happy to be living in America and the Free…..
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy