| Choice is Crystal Clear: Tap Water |
|
|
| Written by Tracy Press / | |
| Wednesday, 07 November 2007 | |
|
A commentary by Gary South of the Blue Ridge Press
The labels show ice-capped mountains, a palm-shrouded hibiscus, or a deer’s silhouette — outdoorsy images calculated to appeal to health-conscious consumers. During the past decade, consumers have bought that image, as sales of bottled water tripled in the U.S. Americans now drink more bottled water than milk or coffee.
But in recent months, the industry has found itself in
troubled waters: Several environmental organizations and local government
officials say bottled water represents a pollution threat to the environment —
and money down the drain for consumers.
The pollution stems from making and transporting billions of
plastic bottles of water. Environmentalists offer a slice of irony: By generating
greenhouse gases, the bottled water industry endangers the very icy mountains
evoked by the best-selling brands — because global warming “is melting those
snowcaps and those glaciers,” said Allen Hershkowitz, a senior scientist at the
National Resources Defense Council.
Jennifer Gitlitz, the research director for the Container
Recycling Institute, calls plastic bottles “the most environmentally egregious
way to distribute water.” Moreover, the empty bottles usually end up in
landfills or as litter: Only one in seven single-serving water bottles is
recycled.
Last summer, numerous cities told municipal employees to put
the stopper on bottled water purchases in order to reduce waste. They included
San Francisco, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, Ann Arbor, Mich., and Vancouver, Wash.
The mayor of Salt Lake City even ordered firefighters to switch from bottled
water to refillable 10-ounce containers.
Government officials want to change citizens’ drinking
habits as well. New York launched a $700,000 marketing campaign urging
residents to opt for tap water over bottled water. “Cool. Healthy. Clean. Zero
sugar. Zero calories,” an ad declared. “NYC Water. Get your fill.”
And get it cheap: If you drink a half-gallon of tap water a
day, you’d pay about 50 cents for the entire year; the equivalent amount of
bottled water could cost $1,400. Not only that, blind taste tests show
consumers often can’t tell the difference between bottled water and municipal
water, and will even select tap water as tasting better than the bottled
variety.
In October, the Sierra Club and other groups took that theme
nationwide. The coalition, led by Corporate Accountability International, is
calling on Americans to “think outside the bottle.” The campaign asks consumers
to sign a pledge to choose tap water instead of bottled water.
The bottled water industry has splashed back. “I think it’s
unfortunate there is now this ‘tap water versus bottled water’ controversy,”
said Joseph Doss, president of the International Bottled Water Association. “We
don’t see it that way. I don’t think consumers are replacing tap water with
bottled water. We make a food product. We see other food products as our
competitors.”
He says consumers “choose bottled water as an alternative to
other packaged beverages when they want to avoid or moderate calories,
caffeine, sugar, artificial flavors or colors, alcohol and other ingredients.”
The industry has a point: Bottled water is a more
responsible choice than other bottled beverages. Moreover, compared with the
environmental impact of other products, plastic water bottles are a drop in the
bucket: They make up less than one-third of 1 percent of U.S. trash.
Americans spent about $11 billion on bottled water in 2006,
more than any other country. That works out to more than 27 gallons per
American. But nine countries consume more bottled water per capita: On average,
Italians annually drink 51 gallons of bottled water per person; in the United
Arab Emirates and Mexico, it’s about 48 gallons.
As the trade association notes, tap water is unsafe in some
countries — and during emergencies like Hurricane Katrina. (In its defense, the
industry even waves the flag of patriotism, saying bottled water was critical
during the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.)
But many of the bottled water industry’s bullet points don’t
hold water. Most bottled water is consumed where tap water is fine. A plastic
bottle of “designer water” has become a lifestyle accessory — conferring status
as much as quenching thirst.
The cumulative effect of shipping water thousands of miles —
from Fiji to New York, for example — is significant, and unnecessary. “Nearly a
quarter of all bottled water crosses national borders to reach consumers,” said
Emily Arnold, a researcher at the Earth Policy Institute.
Manufacturing contributes to the industry’s carbon
footprint. Arnold calculates that it takes 1.5 million barrels of oil a year to
make the plastic bottles for the water Americans drink. That’s enough oil to
generate electricity for 250,000 homes or fuel 100,000 cars a year.
It is consumers who have turned bottled water into a daily
companion and made it the No. 3 beverage in America, behind soft drinks and
beer. Ultimately, it will be consumers who decide whether to buy one last
bottle of bottled water — and refill it themselves from the faucet.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Hits: 1113 Trackback(0)
Comments
(0)
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|